This website is created to think about the problems and how to find the proper way of solution through the think tank families of Pakistan. Who wish to Devote Pakistan.
You may add your comments for Better and progresive Pakistan.
We all love Pakistan the great nation.
read complete information from:
THE CIA connection… BENAZIR BHUTTO’S ASSASSINATION WAS PRE-PLANNED …
Updated Jan 15th, 2007. The mainstream media has finally caught up with the realities as depicted in this article. On Jan 9th, The New York times confirmed the “CIA” coverts operations in Pakistan. This is one of the most popular articles on this site with more than thousands of hits. We keep adding material to it. Visit it often and leave feedback
1.
The assassination was pre-planned and executed via triangulation and the most modern weapons available in the market by Khad, RAW, CIA and Mossad.
2.
The purpose of the covert Khad, RAW, CIA, Mossad operations is to destabilize Pakistan.
3.
The assassination of Ms. Bhutto was a key critical link in this strategy.
4.
Shortage of critically needed foodstuff, massive inflow of money in the hands of rioters, and Geo’s one sided propaganda are dimensions of the psy-ops and dirty tricks campaigns tried and tested in many countries.
5.
Zardari’s insistence on a Rafique Hariri type of UN inquiry is an attempt to sanctify UN sanctions and provide legal cover to a multi-national NATO led military intervention into Pakistan
6.
The goal of the destabilization is to secure Pakistani nukes.
7.
The long term goal is to contain China.
8.
The Pakistani Army is fully aware of the destabilization plans
9.
We now present the thesis and the proof from a plethora of sources.
Pakistani Destabilization and Bhutto blood: CIA in bombshell revalation blames Baitul, BLA, Bugti and Bharat
Insurgents in Pakistan are backed by states that want to destabilize Pakistan.
President Musharraf in an interview on January 17th already hinted at external hands in issues faced by Pakistan. On January 18th, 2008 the head of the CIA said that there are external forces and separatists behind Pakistan’s woes. It is a well known fact that the separatists are backed by India. The CIA interview may be an attempt to deflect blame or to warn India and Afghanistan.
There is a well orchestrated campaign to destabilize Pakistan. There is a master plan. We have to review the macro events to see the significance of the bombing.
Firing in Karachi to create ethnic strife against between Punjabis and Karachi
Bomb blast in Karachi to create divide between new Sindhis and Sindhis in urban and rural Sindh
Bomb blast assassinates Benazir Bhutto to create strife between Sindhis and Punjabis
Bomb blast in Lahore to create rift between Punabis and Pathans
Bomb blast in Peshawar to create rift between Shias and Sunnis
The Washington Post report that the CIA has pointed fingers at external interference in Pakistan. This interference has to be tied in to the countries belligerent to Pakistan. Here are some events that we need to keep track of.
1. Karzai threatens Pakistan
2. Karzai and Musharraf duke it out in the White House and are unable to “kiss and make up”
3. India opens first military base in Central Aisa, near the Pakistani border with long term repercussions for South Asia.
4. SCO, Russia and China enforce anti-terror drive in the Central Asian republics. IMU is under pressure in Uzbekistan. Many fighters flee
5. India opens four consulates in Pashtun areas of Afghanistan
6. Congress approves $250 million in funds to destabilize Iran
7. Iran faces terror attacks in its Arab areas called Khuzistan or Arabistan
8. All of a sudden Jandullah in Iran and BLA (a relic of the cold war) in Pakistan become active.
9. Both Iran and Pakistan face increased level of terror activity.
10. Bugti start mischief and holes up on fortified cave network.
11. Bugtis elimination leaves plans in disarray
12. NATO forces and Britain sign peace deal with some of the Taliban in Southern Afghanistan giving them breathing space.
13. Push theory pushes Talibaan to Waziristna.
14. Drones target areas within Pakistan and torpedo the peace deals between Pakistan and the Taliban.
15. BLA and Uzbek mercenaries discovered in Red Mosque in Islamabad. Islamabad threatened.
16. Benazir is transported to Pakistan with an American agenda and talking points
17. Tremendous pressure on Pakistan forces Pakistan to take action in Waziristan.
18. Pressure on Waziristan pushes insurgents and mercenaries to Swat.
19. Campaign in started to destabilize Pakistan politically. A judicial crisis in created
20. Artificial food shortages created to create dissension
The Washington Post says the following:
The same alliance between local and international terrorists poses a grave risk to the government of President Pervez Musharraf, a close U.S. ally in the fight against terrorism, Hayden said in 45-minute interview with The Washington Post. “What you see is, I think, a change in the character of what’s going on there,” he said. “You’ve got this nexus now that probably was always there in latency but is now active: a nexus between al-Qaeda and various extremist and separatist groups.”
Hayden added, “It is clear that their intention is to continue to try to do harm to the Pakistani state as it currently exists.”
“We’ve always viewed that to be an ultimate danger to the United States,” Hayden said, “but now it appears that it is a serious base of danger to the current well-being of Pakistan.”
The Los Angeles reports
“The Washington Posts first reported the CIA’s take on Friday, in an interview conducted with CIA director Michael Hayden. “This was done by that network around Baitullah Mehsud. We have no reason to question that,” Hayden told the Post. NY Times Jan 18th, 2008
The CIA has concluded that members of al-Qaeda and allies of Pakistani tribal leader Baitullah Mehsud were responsible for last month’s assassination of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto, and that they also stand behind a new wave of violence threatening that country’s stability, the agency’s director, Michael V. Hayden, said in an interview. Washington Post: Jan. 18th, 2008
This site has in depth discussion of all these points.
http://moinansari.wordpress.com
For the past century, Afghanistan has brought instability to Pakistan and the rest of the world for two decades. It is time to end this experiment started by Durand. Urgent steps should be taken to eliminate all foreign forces from South and Central Asia. Pakistani forces can bring peace to Afghanistan. To bring stability to the region and as a first step all the Pashtun provinces should be inculcated into Pakistan. As a later step the Pakistani boundary should extend to the Oxus (Amu Darya). This will make the Pashtuns happy and will help eliminate terrorism in the region.
Proposal for peace in Pakistan:
American wants pakistan like this:
http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ralph-peters-proposals.jpg
Why not Pakistan move for its safety like this:
http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/greater-pakistan.jpg
or like this:
http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/pakistan-including-afghania-secure.jpg
for which why not pakistan get help of China as after pakistan the China is target.
Kick off American aids as well as american from Afghanistan through the help of paktoons. Paktoons are Pakistan’s friendly and they are the key figures to whom american wants to sabotag with the help of pakistan army:
While American wants this:
`Gwadar port has serious strategic implications for India`
Favouring balancing of relations with China to ensure India’s energy and maritime security, Naval Chief Admiral Sureesh Mehta on Monday said the Gwadar strategic port being built by Pakistan with Chinese assistance “has serious strategic implications for India”.
“Being only 180 nautical miles from the exit of the straits of Hormuz, Gwadar, being bulit in Baluchistan coast, would enable Pakistan take control over the world energy jugular and interdiction of Indian tankers,” he said.
The challenge for India was to balance relations with China in such a manner that competition for strategically significant space in the Indian ocean leads to cooperation rather than conflict, he said in his address at the fifth T S Narayanaswamy memorial lecture here.
“The pressure for countries to cooperate in the maritime military domain to ensure smooth flow of energy and commerce on the high seas will grow even further,” he said speaking on “oceanic influence on India’s development in the next decade.”
Talking about “Chinese designs on the Indian ocean,” Mehta said China had a strategy called `string of pearls,’ as per which it seeks to set up bases and outposts across the globe, strategically located along its energy lines, to monitor and saefeguard energy flows. “Each pearl in the string is a link in a chain of the Chinese maritime presence,” he said.
“Among other locations, the string moves northwards upto Gwadar deep sea port on Pakistan’s Makran coast. A highway is under construction joining Gwadar with Karachi and there are plans to connect the port with the Karakoram highway, thus providing China a gateway to Arabian sea,” he said adding this could pose a problem for India.
Further, India, as a regional power with a dominant position in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), “must take the lead in initiating collaborative frameworks in the maritime arena,” Mehta said.
Stating that oceanic influence on India’s foreign policy would grow in the next decade, he also said the navy wanted a single coordinating policy making apex body which would “meet the challenges of the future.”
“The naval headquarters is of the view that a maritime security board should be created, which will coordinate with 14 different government departments and agencies repsonsible for maritime affairs,” he said.
Expressing concern over the shipbuilding industry in the country, he said it was “very small by present global standards.”
“No nation can aspire for great power status by only buying ships…. We have to build them. Despite orders of 32 warships and six submarines with defence shipyards, their capacity and capability to build ships are just not enough to meet our force accretion plans,” he said. Interacting with the audience, Mehta said the Sethusamudram shipping canal project was a “viable one but may not be useful to big ships running on international routes,”
Bureau Report
China insists its interest in Gwadar is purely commercial. No doubt it is hoping that the port will transform the economy of its landlocked Xinjiang province.
However, Gwadar port has a far-larger significance in China’s scheme of things. It is said to be the western-most pearl in China’s “string of pearls” strategy (this is a strategy that envisages building strategic relations with several countries along sea lanes from the Middle East to the South China Sea to protect China’s energy interests and other security objectives), the other “pearls” being naval facilities in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and the South China Sea. [1]
China’s interest in the Gwadar project stems from the port’s proximity to the Strait of Hormuz. A base at Gwadar enables China to secure the flow of its oil – 60% of its energy supplies come from the Middle East – through the strait. More important, Gwadar is said to be a “listening post” for the Chinese, one that will enable Beijing to monitor movement of US and Indian ships in the region.
Pakistan is eyeing huge economic and strategic gains, with Gwadar poised to become a key shipping hub at the mouth of a strategic waterway. A port at Gwadar provides Pakistan with strategic depth vis-a-vis India. Gwadar is 725km to the west of Karachi port, making it that much less vulnerable than Karachi to an Indian naval blockade.
Not surprisingly, the construction of Gwadar port and Sino-Pakistan cooperation in the project are causing concern for India, the United States and Iran. The Chinese presence in the Arabian Sea heightens India’s feeling of encirclement by China. Iran fears that the development of Gwadar port will undermine the value of its own ports as outlets to Central Asia’s exports.
As for the US, it has been uncomfortable with Chinese presence at the mouth of a key waterway. And now in the run-up to a possible war with Iran, Washington appears to be eyeing Gwadar’s naval facilities all the more. It appears that the US is pressuring Pakistan to reduce Chinese involvement in the project and to involve Washington instead.
The New Delhi-based online Public Affairs Magazine has reported that the US “could be [pressuring] Pakistan to outprice the Chinese from Gwadar to take over the entire facility”. Citing diplomats, the report said: “Pakistan has now raised the cost of Chinese participation to US$3 billion in addition to the $1.5 billion yearly payment, which China has refused, saying it is steep, and in breach of the terms of the contract. China has said that it had already agreed to offset construction costs by giving Pakistan four frigates, but Pakistan is unmoved, and offered to return all the Chinese investment, if they would have it that way.”
Dismissing such reports as “wishful thinking on the part of India”, a Pakistani government official told Asia Times Online that the Gwadar project was “very much on track” and that “Sino-Pakistan cooperation in the venture remains strong”.
But even if the reported differences between China and Pakistan in the Gwadar project were indeed “wishful thinking on the part of India”, the project is under fire from Baloch insurgents.
Balochis are not opposed to the Gwadar port project or other megaprojects per se. What they are opposed to is the way these projects have been conceived and implemented. They resent the fact Balochis have been excluded from the benefits of these projects and that “outsiders” have grown rich by exploiting Baloch resources. Balochistan’s Sui gas reserves, for instance, meet 38% of Pakistan’s energy needs, but only 6% of Balochistan’s 6 million people have access to it, and the royalties Balochistan receives for its gas are very low, especially when compared with what other provinces receive.
Likewise, the Gwadar project does not seem to be transforming Baloch lives for the better. Baloch nationalists see Gwadar as “a non-Baloch project”, one that has been conceived and implemented without provincial approval or participation, in which “outsiders” have gained the most. They point out that land in Gwadar is being sold at throwaway prices to non-Baloch civil-military elites.
There is concern, too, that the Gwadar project would leave Balochis a minority in their homeland. As the Baloch leader, the Khan of Kalat, pointed out in an interview to the Pakistani daily Dawn, the entire project would need at least a million people, and with Gwadar being a town of 60,000, people from “Karachi, mostly Urdu-speaking”, would be brought in.
Not surprisingly, then, the Gwadar project has been repeatedly targeted by Baloch insurgent groups such as the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the Baloch Liberation Front and the Baloch People’s Liberation Army. Insurgents have struck repeatedly with bombs and rocket attacks. In 2004 for instance, Gwadar airport was the target of rocket attacks.
Several of the insurgent attacks in Gwadar have targeted Chinese working on this project. About 500 Chinese engineers are employed in Gwadar. On May 3, 2004, three Chinese engineers were killed and nine others injured in a bomb blast by the BLA. On May 14 last year, four bombs went off in Gwadar. Then in October, several Chinese engineers had a narrow escape when the vehicle in which they were traveling missed a landmine. The following month, insurgents launched a rocket attack on a Chinese construction company in the Tallar area of Gwadar district. The Chinese engineers and other staff escaped unhurt but several vehicles were damaged.
In total, according to official data, there were 187 bomb blasts, 275 rocket attacks, eight attacks on gas pipelines, 36 attacks on electricity-transmission lines and 19 explosions on railway lines in 2005. At least 182 civilians and 26 security force personnel died in the province during 2005.
An interesting aspect about Baloch nationalist insurgents, who are by and large secular, and the religious militants is that while both view China as an enemy, their opposition to Chinese involvement in the Gwadar project differs. Tarique Niazi, a specialist on resource-based conflict, said: “Baloch nationalists, for instance, are opposed to the Chinese government for advancing its strategic goals at the expense of their freedom and autonomy. But several religiously inspired groups are opposed to the Chinese government for its putative persecution of the Uighur Muslim minority in the autonomous region of Xinjiang.”
The kidnapping of two Chinese engineers in October 2004 by members of the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) is said to have been a response to Pakistan’s killing of ETIM chief Hasan Mahsum, to whom it had provided shelter in South Waziristan, on Beijing’s request.
While India, Iran and the US might be wary of the Sino-Pakistan cooperation in Gwadar, internal opposition to the bonding seems far greater, as indicated by the ferocity and frequency of attacks on the Gwadar project and Chinese employees there.
With the Baloch insurgency growing in intensity and the Pakistani government’s military approach to the problem only fueling Baloch resentment and the insurgency further, it does seem that even if the Gwadar port project is, as officials claim, “on track”, it will be near impossible to realize its full potential.
Note
[1] In Bangladesh, China is building a container port facility at Chittagong and is “seeking much more extensive naval and commercial access”, according to reports.
In Myanmar, China is building naval bases and has electronic intelligence-gathering facilities on islands in the Bay of Bengal and near the Strait of Malacca.
In Cambodia, China signed a military agreement in November 2003 to provide training and equipment.
In Thailand, Chinese navy ships took part in a joint search-and-rescue exercise with the Thai navy in the Gulf of Thailand December 13, 2005. The drill, the first between the two navies, was launched after a Chinese navy ships formation concluded a four-day visit.
Sudha Ramachandran is an independent journalist/researcher based in Bangalore.